science-journalism
Original: science-journalism on Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
Transcript
Panel 1:
Man with reddish hair (holding a clipboard/paper): So what'd the experiment find?
Woman with reddish hair: Either we had a slight measuring error, or all of physics is wrong.
Panel 2 (a newspaper):
Headline: EXPERIMENT MAY OVERTURN EINSTEIN
Subhead: "...OR PHYSICS IS WRONG," SAYS SCIENTIST
Votey:
Text (styled like an online article headline): EINSTEIN PWNED
43 GIFS EXPLAIN WHY
Below the text is a large "1" and the top of a cat's head/face peeking up from the bottom edge of the panel (clickbait listicle / cat-photo style).
Man with reddish hair (holding a clipboard/paper): So what'd the experiment find?
Woman with reddish hair: Either we had a slight measuring error, or all of physics is wrong.
Panel 2 (a newspaper):
Headline: EXPERIMENT MAY OVERTURN EINSTEIN
Subhead: "...OR PHYSICS IS WRONG," SAYS SCIENTIST
Votey:
Text (styled like an online article headline): EINSTEIN PWNED
43 GIFS EXPLAIN WHY
Below the text is a large "1" and the top of a cat's head/face peeking up from the bottom edge of the panel (clickbait listicle / cat-photo style).
Alt text
A two-panel comic. Panel 1: A man holding a paper asks a woman, "So what'd the experiment find?" She replies, "Either we had a slight measuring error, or all of physics is wrong." Panel 2: A newspaper shows the sensational headline "EXPERIMENT MAY OVERTURN EINSTEIN" with the subhead "...OR PHYSICS IS WRONG, SAYS SCIENTIST" — the press has seized on the dramatic possibility while ignoring the far more likely measuring error. Votey: A clickbait-style listicle headline reads "EINSTEIN PWNED — 43 GIFS EXPLAIN WHY," with a big number "1" and a cat's face poking up from the bottom of the frame, mocking how online media would cover the story.
Transcribed by Claude Opus 4.8.