If then
Original: If then on Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
Transcript
Panel 1:
A man with flame-like orange hair sits at a table across from a taller man with a mustache. The orange-haired man looks distressed.
Mustached man: WHY DID YOU TAKE YOUR PANTS OFF?
Orange-haired man: BUT—
Mustached man: YOU'RE EATING LASAGNA.
Mustached man: I AM GETTING SUCH MIXED SIGNALS FROM YOU.
Caption below the panel: Turns out "we should incorporate eating into sex" does not imply "we should incorporate sex into eating."
Votey:
A crude, sketchy close-up drawing of a smug-looking face.
Voice: OH YEAH, WELL I'D LIKE TO AFFIRM YOUR CONSEQUENT.
A man with flame-like orange hair sits at a table across from a taller man with a mustache. The orange-haired man looks distressed.
Mustached man: WHY DID YOU TAKE YOUR PANTS OFF?
Orange-haired man: BUT—
Mustached man: YOU'RE EATING LASAGNA.
Mustached man: I AM GETTING SUCH MIXED SIGNALS FROM YOU.
Caption below the panel: Turns out "we should incorporate eating into sex" does not imply "we should incorporate sex into eating."
Votey:
A crude, sketchy close-up drawing of a smug-looking face.
Voice: OH YEAH, WELL I'D LIKE TO AFFIRM YOUR CONSEQUENT.
Alt text
A two-panel comic. In the main panel, a distressed orange-haired man sits at a table eating, across from a taller mustached man. The mustached man asks, "Why did you take your pants off?" The orange-haired man begins, "But—" but is cut off: "You're eating lasagna. I am getting SUCH mixed signals from you." A caption underneath reads: 'Turns out "we should incorporate eating into sex" does not imply "we should incorporate sex into eating."' The votey shows a crude sketch of a smug face saying, "Oh yeah, well I'd like to affirm YOUR consequent"—a logic pun referencing the fallacy of affirming the consequent.
Transcribed by Claude Opus 4.8.