underwear
Original: underwear on Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
Transcript
Panel 1
Woman: I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW. I'M NOT WEARING MY CLOTHES. YOUR UNDERWEAR.
Panel 2
Woman: THEY'RE NOT UNDER ANYTHING.
Panel 3
Man: SO IF YOU'RE JUST WEARING A SHIRT AND PANTIES, THEN YOUR UNDERWEAR. THEY'RE JUST CLOTHES? THEY HAVE A LUXURIOUS--
Panel 4
Woman: WHY ARE WE ARGUING ABOUT THIS?
Man: I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE I HAD A SEMANTIC ERROR AND I WOULD BE ACKNOWLEDGED AS HAVING A POINT.
Panel 5
Woman: I WAS TRYING TO TALK YOU INTO HAVING SEX.
Panel 6
Man: I WANT THAT VERY BADLY. BUT I WANT THIS MORE.
Votey:
Woman: I'M ALSO NOT WEARING UNDERWEAR, BUT NOT ON PURPOSE.
Woman: I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW. I'M NOT WEARING MY CLOTHES. YOUR UNDERWEAR.
Panel 2
Woman: THEY'RE NOT UNDER ANYTHING.
Panel 3
Man: SO IF YOU'RE JUST WEARING A SHIRT AND PANTIES, THEN YOUR UNDERWEAR. THEY'RE JUST CLOTHES? THEY HAVE A LUXURIOUS--
Panel 4
Woman: WHY ARE WE ARGUING ABOUT THIS?
Man: I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE I HAD A SEMANTIC ERROR AND I WOULD BE ACKNOWLEDGED AS HAVING A POINT.
Panel 5
Woman: I WAS TRYING TO TALK YOU INTO HAVING SEX.
Panel 6
Man: I WANT THAT VERY BADLY. BUT I WANT THIS MORE.
Votey:
Woman: I'M ALSO NOT WEARING UNDERWEAR, BUT NOT ON PURPOSE.
Alt text
A six-panel comic showing a brown-haired woman and a brown-haired man having a tense conversation. The woman tells the man she isn't wearing her clothes / his underwear, insisting they aren't 'under' anything. The man gets pedantically caught up in the semantics of whether underwear that's worn on its own still counts as underwear. The woman, exasperated, demands why they are arguing about this. The man admits he doesn't know, but suspects he had a semantic point he wanted acknowledged. The woman reveals she was actually trying to talk him into having sex. In the final panel the man says he wants that very badly, but he wants to win the argument more. Votey: against a black silhouette of the two figures, the woman adds, 'I'm also not wearing underwear, but not on purpose.'
Transcribed by Claude Opus 4.8.